<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navigation Bars Part 3 &#8211; Advanced Backgrounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephenmcintyre.net/blog/navigation-bars-part-3-advanced-backgrounds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephenmcintyre.net/blog/navigation-bars-part-3-advanced-backgrounds/</link>
	<description>Young Scottish Web Designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 19:48:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://stephenmcintyre.net/blog/navigation-bars-part-3-advanced-backgrounds/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenmcintyre.net/?p=71#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Ah interesting. I hadn&#039;t thought about that but it does make sense.

Suppose it&#039;s down to how much bandwidth those few extra KBs will actually affect your servers, which for smaller sites isn&#039;t much and you would be better off helping with user experience.

Thanks Eric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah interesting. I hadn&#8217;t thought about that but it does make sense.</p>
<p>Suppose it&#8217;s down to how much bandwidth those few extra KBs will actually affect your servers, which for smaller sites isn&#8217;t much and you would be better off helping with user experience.</p>
<p>Thanks Eric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://stephenmcintyre.net/blog/navigation-bars-part-3-advanced-backgrounds/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenmcintyre.net/?p=71#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I get trying to make the filesize as small as possible, but a 1px image has to be blitted 144 times(according to your example) by the renderer.

This can cause slowness - not in loading the image, but in actual rendering and browser responsiveness - especially when scrolling a page. It&#039;s much better to increase the image width to 10~20px.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get trying to make the filesize as small as possible, but a 1px image has to be blitted 144 times(according to your example) by the renderer.</p>
<p>This can cause slowness &#8211; not in loading the image, but in actual rendering and browser responsiveness &#8211; especially when scrolling a page. It&#8217;s much better to increase the image width to 10~20px.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
